Show Transphobic comments

Show Intentionally silencing the truth

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol, if we start excluding tech based on the inventors mental illnesses we are gonna end up bashing rocks together to make fire.

    Edit: To be clear, I am not saying that being trans is a mental illness, only refuting that mental illness is not a reason to discard ones contributions. Apologies for any offence.

    • HornyOnMain
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      .>calling being trans a mental illness

      sus incredibly sus ngl unsus

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        ·
        1 year ago

        The original post called it a mental illness, i was following that. Apologies if I caused offence it was not intended.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            ·
            1 year ago

            The original post referred to it as a mental illness, and claimed that was a reason to ignore their contribution. I was simply pointing out the silliness of that logic. I dont think its a mental illness, amd I have absolutely no problem with the trans community.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              deleted by creator

              • CameronDev@programming.dev
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didnt say anything about trans people in my original comment, and deliberately didnt quote the original post as its language disgusts me. Again, sorry for any offence caused, it was not intentional.

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 days ago

                  deleted by creator

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's so easy to be called *phobic these days. It reminds of those relationships in which people feel like they are walking on eggshells.

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember back when I thought all FOSS was part of the FSF, and that itself was formed of hippie liberal progressives. Had a rude awakening when I found about the MIT vs GPL rift, and then another on HN when I realised half the people in software were just there to make money.

    • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a period where I didn't really understand the GPL or what it was trying to do. All I knew is that it was ""viral"" (whatever the hell that meant!) and that, supposedly, trying to use it would forever bind you and your creation to who knows what unforeseen legal horrors. I mean, look how long it is! It's frightening! I wanted absolutely nothing to do with it at first.

      Then I got a clue and actually read it. It's quite straightforward. For almost all serves and purposes it's basically just MIT plus copyleft. All the legal density is just an effort to squash every conceivable loophole to the copyleft directive. I'm no longer afraid of it, I think it's pretty cool.

      The thing I want to know now is why so many projects think their shit don't stink and that they need to pollute the FOSS ecosystem with their own stupid permissive license that is functionally identical to the MIT license.

  • IverCoder@lemm.ee
    hexagon
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry for the Windows emojis lol, I'm on a computer shop as I post this on lunch break

  • Hazel@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only read the first comment and the use of a slur and deep transphobic talking points made me stop reading the rest.

    As a trans woman myself... thanks for all this non transphobia in this comment thread <333

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you're against Wayland, you are against peace freedom and democracy !! Also probably anti-Semite communist antilgbt brexiter , oh and racist of course !!