I prefer option 1 to option 2, but at least with option 2 you could make the argument that at least then the trilogy would've consistently been one guy's vision and he wouldn't have wasted the 3rd movie pretty much just undoing the previous one that he disagreed with.
I prefer option 1 to option 2, but at least with option 2 you could make the argument that at least then the trilogy would've consistently been one guy's vision and he wouldn't have wasted the 3rd movie pretty much just undoing the previous one that he disagreed with.
I just hate Abrams for what he did to Star Trek and hopes everything in his life turns to ashes in his hands.
At least Abrams left. Kurtzman still has his foul grasp on the franchise.
"What if the future was just capitalism but with Star Trek technology?" Fuck you CBS.