Would love to ask Glenn what he feels is more pernicious: the CIA coopting woke language in bad faith in a recruitment video that, as of right now, only has 100k views on YouTube or Tucker Carlson coopting the language of class in bad faith on his show that is watched nightly by several million impressionable dipshits.
It's all just language policing. Coming from some dipshit terminally online pundit, it amounts to nothing.
The CIA's ad was cringe. Tucker's rhetoric is absolutely poisonous. They both serve the same class interests. Bemoaning the malicious use of rhetoric is glorified navel gazing.
But if we're going to play the game, I'll argue that Glenn going on Tucker to criticize the CIA is good, aktuly.
Would love to ask Glenn what he feels is more pernicious: the CIA coopting woke language in bad faith in a recruitment video that, as of right now, only has 100k views on YouTube or Tucker Carlson coopting the language of class in bad faith on his show that is watched nightly by several million impressionable dipshits.
It's all just language policing. Coming from some dipshit terminally online pundit, it amounts to nothing.
The CIA's ad was cringe. Tucker's rhetoric is absolutely poisonous. They both serve the same class interests. Bemoaning the malicious use of rhetoric is glorified navel gazing.
But if we're going to play the game, I'll argue that Glenn going on Tucker to criticize the CIA is good, aktuly.