WhyEssEff [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square28 fedilinkarrow-up153file-textcross-posted to: chat
arrow-up153external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashWhyEssEff [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-24 years agomessage-square28 Commentsfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: chat
minus-squarePezevenk [he/him]hexbear4·4 years ago He said things like that before Brazil, just not as much There is a million other ways to do that which would probably be more effective too. link
minus-squarepluggd [they/them]hexbear5·4 years agoYeah, well aware of the history. Doesn't change the fact that he's much safer with a large international profile than without and that it's a common strategy. What other ways would be more effective, genuinely? link
minus-squarePezevenk [he/him]hexbear3·4 years agoI mean there are other ways to be intentionally controversial and talked about... Ones that won't alienate a big part of your audience... link
minus-squarepluggd [they/them]hexbear4·4 years agohmm Greenwald has been less worried than his peers about alienating whatever could be defined as his audience imo link
He said things like that before Brazil, just not as much
There is a million other ways to do that which would probably be more effective too.
Yeah, well aware of the history. Doesn't change the fact that he's much safer with a large international profile than without and that it's a common strategy. What other ways would be more effective, genuinely?
I mean there are other ways to be intentionally controversial and talked about... Ones that won't alienate a big part of your audience...
hmm Greenwald has been less worried than his peers about alienating whatever could be defined as his audience imo