Slavoj is such a weird figure. He basically grew up watching the West use identity politics to destroy Yugoslavia. The Communist Party there hated him and he even ran in a social democratic party for president. His philosophical ideas were and still are quite popular in Western countries though. He claims to be a revolutionary Marxist, hangs a portrait of Stalin in his home, and has written that basically global communism is the only way to fight catastrophes like coronavirus and climate change. I honestly think that there is a lot we can learn from him. Lacan and Hegel and psychoanalysis are fascinating subjects. But trans people have a right to exist and it was a huge mistake of the left to basically ignore identity politics in the twentieth century. If any comrades feel I am mistaken please correct me so I can learn.
He does address identity politics in a nuanced way throughout his work, he views it as the hysterical response which is also a necessary/ fundamental moment in articulating a critique of ideology and hegemony, it's merely that this, the proliferation of the multiplicity of identities, is not in itself revolutionary. He absolutely believes trans people have the right to exist, housing, work, have full political agency, families, friends... His whole point is that these things should not hinge on whether identity of the other is merely tolerated, but on the basis of a shared emancipatory project which excepts no one. I just think he principally refuses to fetishize transgender identity (which can appear callous and be weaponized through reactionary framing).
I think a good feminist interlocutor from the same Lacanian frame as Zizek is Mari Ruti if you want to check her out. She offers a ton engagement with the notion of identity and most of her work I've read has also woven in very valid critiques of Zizek (and while these are grounded in a more individualist frame, she writes in a much more accessible manner). I get that Lacanian discourses around the phallus, castration, hysteria and whatnot can sound hyperpatriarchal, but the core implications are actually radically egalitarian if you grasp them correctly. Castration is the precondition of subjectivity for all of us.
Also the thumbnail above is obviously inflammatory relative to the content of the video, come on
He suffers from being a meme (meaning people are rarely given a reason to engage directly with his work), and from the fact that he rather likes being a meme, and plays up the character in interviews.
Anyway I'm 90% sure his take here is boneheaded, but that doesn't invalidate everything he's ever said.
Slavoj is such a weird figure. He basically grew up watching the West use identity politics to destroy Yugoslavia. The Communist Party there hated him and he even ran in a social democratic party for president. His philosophical ideas were and still are quite popular in Western countries though. He claims to be a revolutionary Marxist, hangs a portrait of Stalin in his home, and has written that basically global communism is the only way to fight catastrophes like coronavirus and climate change. I honestly think that there is a lot we can learn from him. Lacan and Hegel and psychoanalysis are fascinating subjects. But trans people have a right to exist and it was a huge mistake of the left to basically ignore identity politics in the twentieth century. If any comrades feel I am mistaken please correct me so I can learn.
He does address identity politics in a nuanced way throughout his work, he views it as the hysterical response which is also a necessary/ fundamental moment in articulating a critique of ideology and hegemony, it's merely that this, the proliferation of the multiplicity of identities, is not in itself revolutionary. He absolutely believes trans people have the right to exist, housing, work, have full political agency, families, friends... His whole point is that these things should not hinge on whether identity of the other is merely tolerated, but on the basis of a shared emancipatory project which excepts no one. I just think he principally refuses to fetishize transgender identity (which can appear callous and be weaponized through reactionary framing).
I think a good feminist interlocutor from the same Lacanian frame as Zizek is Mari Ruti if you want to check her out. She offers a ton engagement with the notion of identity and most of her work I've read has also woven in very valid critiques of Zizek (and while these are grounded in a more individualist frame, she writes in a much more accessible manner). I get that Lacanian discourses around the phallus, castration, hysteria and whatnot can sound hyperpatriarchal, but the core implications are actually radically egalitarian if you grasp them correctly. Castration is the precondition of subjectivity for all of us.
Also the thumbnail above is obviously inflammatory relative to the content of the video, come on
He suffers from being a meme (meaning people are rarely given a reason to engage directly with his work), and from the fact that he rather likes being a meme, and plays up the character in interviews.
Anyway I'm 90% sure his take here is boneheaded, but that doesn't invalidate everything he's ever said.