he's an academic contrarian because the highest echelons of academic philosophy are singularly concerned with having the most hare-brained contrarian streaks possible but not so wacky to stir up some kind of genuine movement, just enough to get students to argue back and forth forever
he's an academic contrarian because the highest echelons of academic philosophy are singularly concerned with having the most hare-brained contrarian streaks possible but not so wacky to stir up some kind of genuine movement, just enough to get students to argue back and forth forever
That makes a lot of sense. It turns me off real quick