But what Bookchin meant by post-scarcity didn’t require full automation, just the ability to produce at a level where a high standard of living didn’t have to be rationed, which he thought was first achievable with mid-1960s technology
Sure. And Krompkin thought it was possible with 1890s technologies. A lot hinges on your anticipated standard of living. Do you want planes? Do you want MRI machines? Do you want a Space Program? Etc.
Post-Scarcity is here, if all you care about is a 19th century serf's quality of life. But that doesn't cover things like literacy or security or any kind of social life.
We could have a post-scarcity society today, but the way we allocate resources prevents us from doing so, and creates artificial scarcity.
We allocate resources towards the security state, which explicitly enables the class hierarchy. Keep building new kinds of gate, and you'll always have gatekeepers and rent seekers.
Intellectual property law and the extraction of rents it allows becomes the basis for elite wealth and control. Such a society would have a problem of effective demand, which would be addressed with a combination of violent enforcement/guard labor, and UBI – here you can see why UBI is popular with techbros. That said, the long-term trajectory of Rentism probably tends towards Communism;
Again, I think the big hiccup in this expectation is in the advancement of security technology. As securing both physical and intellectual property becomes cheaper, the Capitalist State becomes more secure.
What is the upper bound on efficient security state? What's the political and economic limit of a Renter society? I don't know. But I think Americans are focusing their time and energy on finding out.
Sure. And Krompkin thought it was possible with 1890s technologies. A lot hinges on your anticipated standard of living. Do you want planes? Do you want MRI machines? Do you want a Space Program? Etc.
Post-Scarcity is here, if all you care about is a 19th century serf's quality of life. But that doesn't cover things like literacy or security or any kind of social life.
We allocate resources towards the security state, which explicitly enables the class hierarchy. Keep building new kinds of gate, and you'll always have gatekeepers and rent seekers.
Again, I think the big hiccup in this expectation is in the advancement of security technology. As securing both physical and intellectual property becomes cheaper, the Capitalist State becomes more secure.
What is the upper bound on efficient security state? What's the political and economic limit of a Renter society? I don't know. But I think Americans are focusing their time and energy on finding out.