This was effective in stopping me from drinking til age 20. Too drunk to google it right now, can someone enlighten me about this phrase?
In that vein, I propose another slogan: "Capitalism kills brain cells."
This was effective in stopping me from drinking til age 20. Too drunk to google it right now, can someone enlighten me about this phrase?
In that vein, I propose another slogan: "Capitalism kills brain cells."
I drank so much last week that I would be brain dead now if that was the case. I might be though, idk.
BTW no it doesn't do that typically but it might give you some kind of brain damage if you drink way too much or if you are alcoholic and do it regularly. Alcoholism is very dangerous in general.
Also it always seemed weird to me how late Americans start drinking. I remember my dad let me take sips from his drink ever since I was a little kid, and I started drinking large quantities at about 15. 15 is about the time most people I know really started drinking, I remember we'd take a big shopping cart and put a bunch of booze in it and go to a small park, get shit faced and freestyle rap a couple times a year. It was fun but I wouldn't recommend it tbh. While I do drink lots every now and then, I try not to do it frequently at all because I've got bad experiences with alcoholics... My rule is never drink alone.
deleted by creator
Yeah and honestly I'm glad I never ever feel like crave it. But even if I do feel like breaking the rule, all I have to do is remember my dad being a miserable red faced boomer drinking tsipouro before he even has lunch. And he is not even "alcoholic" in the sense that most people think. It's not nice and I don't wanna be that so even though I don't really feel like breaking my rule anyways, I have it there just in case.
Even moderate drinking absolutely has a negative effect on cognition, as well as a negative effect on pretty much every other aspect of your health. "Kills brain cells" probably isn't medically accurate language but the idea is generally correct.
There is no evidence for that.
Actually there is some slight evidence to the contrary.
One study being totally inconclusive is not the same as "there's no evidence." Here's evidence from the first page of Google results lol.
https://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j2353
There are so many very obvious issues with the routinely published studies that show "light drinking actually is good for your______" and get immediately printed across all the media outlets and a segment on local news.
The one you cited for example seems to suggest that light drinking protects cognitive abilities from the effects of aging, but only in white people? Does that make any sense or is it likely that there's a confounding variable (like white people who drink one glass of wine each night are better off financially and spent their whole lives in comfort).
One of the major issues is that a lot of such studies compare "current non drinkers" to current light drinkers, neglecting to account for the fact that many current non drinkers are either former alcoholics who already did damage to their bodies or don't drink because of other health conditions.
It clearly means there are conflicting studies. Like I can find tons of studies saying the exact opposite of what that one you posted showed. The one I already posted after that one for instance. Even the definition of moderate quantities in that research is kind of weird. Like if you drink 14-21 drinks per week, that's kind of a lot in my book.
Alcohol is straight up one of the least healthy things you can put in your body and it's weird that people are determined to think that "just a little bit of this highly toxic and addictive drug is actually good for you!" But I guess not that weird when you consider that it's a multi billion dollar industry which largely depends on people not taking the health effects seriously. It's also a carcinogen that increases your risk of all types of cancer in even moderate amounts, yet many people seem to not realize that either.
Yeah so weird that people don't lose their shit over weird clickbait articles explaining to you how you will literally die if you do x on one day and then shout about how you will literally die if you don't do x the next day for completely innocuous and normal things.
Alcohol isnt innocuous, the health effects are well studied. This is almost as ridiculous as trying to argue that smoking a little bit is good for you, which to be fair is something people did try to argue until fairly recently, because there's a lot of money to be made by deceiving people about that as well.
Yes, and never had it been shown that low or moderate consumption carries any sort of serious risk anywhere near conclusively.
Uhhhh I'm very sorry to inform you that there is tons of money to be made by doing the opposite too. Making people panic about everything is how a lot of media as well as the health and fitness industry survive on.