MazovianThought [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 3 years agoThe Left understander has logged onimagemessage-square38 fedilinkarrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182imageThe Left understander has logged onMazovianThought [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 3 years agomessage-square38 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]hexbear15·edit-23 years agoI thought this guy's brand was something like "chud-whisperer dem," is he just a full blown chud now? link
minus-squareHumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]hexbear21·3 years agohe was never a dem, but he wrote in a way that made beltway dems secure in their classist prejudices. link
minus-squareRod_Blagojevic [none/use name]hexbear15·edit-23 years agoDems thought he was one of them because of his weird distrust of hillbillies. Edit: I never read his book, but literally every source that I trust found it to be appalling. More Edits: Another thing he has in common with dems is complete failure/refusal to understand politics through the lense of class conflict. link
minus-squareMarxNAngels [none/use name]hexbear7·3 years agoi'm pretty sure his normative prescriptions have always been "welfare bad, entrepreneurship good" but i have never read him. link
I thought this guy's brand was something like "chud-whisperer dem," is he just a full blown chud now?
he was never a dem, but he wrote in a way that made beltway dems secure in their classist prejudices.
Dems thought he was one of them because of his weird distrust of hillbillies.
Edit: I never read his book, but literally every source that I trust found it to be appalling.
More Edits: Another thing he has in common with dems is complete failure/refusal to understand politics through the lense of class conflict.
i'm pretty sure his normative prescriptions have always been "welfare bad, entrepreneurship good" but i have never read him.