The link at the start is this post.

Since this is long, I will summarise the key points:

  1. The mod team argues that being gay or trans is not biologically based, they argue it is caused by environmental factors caused by capitalism and bourgeoise ideology.

  2. The mod team argues being LGBT is a choice.

  3. The mod team argues that LGBT people should be thrown under a bus because they're just 6% of the population who get in the way of popular support with the remaining 94% of the population.

  4. The mod team argues LGBT identities only gain support in socialist countries when socialism in those countries is declining and collapsing due to bourgeoise ideology.

These seem to be the key things this modteam believes about LGBT people. I haven't misrepresented or exaggerated any of this. I do not have to.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I assume they mean it would simply disappear over several generations in the correct environmental conditions but have not asked the question.

    • RealAssHistoryHours [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      No it's even dumber. They think homosexuality can't be biological because if it was it would immediately die out because gay people don't reproduce.

      • anaesidemus [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        wow that's crazy, they do not know how genes work.

        also gay people can and do reproduce. They have children before they come out of the closet, they have surrogate mothers, they use donor semen, they can also be bisexual.

        • RealAssHistoryHours [he/him,they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, I went over there a few minutes ago, because I hate myself and someone posted an article about Lysenko and they're saying the gene is a "metaphysical concept."

        • Nakoichi [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I forget where I read about it but there was some article that stated that evolutionary processes could also explain that people who don't necessarily reproduce themselves could also have an evolutionary advantage to a species by being a sort of beneficial support system. If you have more adults that don't necessarily reproduce themselves, that they also contribute to the health of the species as a whole in supportive roles. Just because someone doesn't bare children doesn't mean they can't help the survival of the children of other members of their family/tribe/etc.

          • CrimsonSage [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Ah yes the famously non-biological 'choice' of human behavior, you know that thing that completely isn't an emergent property of a highly complex biological phenomenon. Yep no biology there, just pure disembodied thinking energy making choices.