• edge [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The prequels were about liberalism's decay into fascism. The OT was about revolutionary resistance to fascism.

    Then Disney bought it and wrote them as trying to reinstate liberalism only for it to decay into fascism again, so the sequels were about fighting fascism again in order to reinstate liberalism again.

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least we have Andor where it's clear most of the Rebels are revolutionaries that get ratfucked by Mon Mothma and her libs.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read Andor's rebels as a surge of popular discontent against Imperial rule that got hijacked by the deposed ruling class into a movement to restore the old shitty system instead of actually effective change.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          It's pretty good. Main character is loosely based on Young Stalin. There's a great speech by Space Lenin that directly quotes Brecht and Gramsci (Gramsci gets a few other quote drops too.)

    • Vncredleader
      ·
      1 year ago

      By the time of 9 they are not even talking about restoring liberalism or the pretense of democracy again. It is just the rebellion. The rebels become totally apolitical, thus Abrams keeps the franchise in an eternal state of rebels vs empire like he is a kid playing with toys reenacting the OT over and over again

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          i thought the "knights of ren" were another shitty side gig like they made a bunch of in the comic books, except worse and less thought out.