The enlightenment era philosophers are ambiguous enough where you can mold them into whatever you'd like. There's stuff within Kant's writing that can't be read as anything except a criticism of what would later be coined as capitalism. Then you have his views on morality which can be seen as diametrically opposed to Marx's analysis of how morality is shaped by material realities
Who is the guy between FDR and Nietzsche?
Also Hegel made it on the board but not Marx, lol.
Kant
Isn’t he like, a founding conservative ethics guy? Someone told me that Idk if that's legit.
The enlightenment era philosophers are ambiguous enough where you can mold them into whatever you'd like. There's stuff within Kant's writing that can't be read as anything except a criticism of what would later be coined as capitalism. Then you have his views on morality which can be seen as diametrically opposed to Marx's analysis of how morality is shaped by material realities
Oh yes, Kant kind of has generic 18th century white guy face, no swag, unlike my man Robespierre.
Imagine if they'd put both Stirner and Hegel on the cover but not Marx lmao