A federal court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that a Massachusetts school for children with disabilities can continue administering electric shocks to its students.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had previously banned the electric shock treatment used at the Judge Rotenberg Center, Canton. The institution created the controversial treatment to correct aggressive or self-harming behaviour in adults and children.

The school, along with a group of parents and guardians of students, had challenged the previous FDA ban. The court of appeals for the DC Circuit found that the treatment falls into medical regulations and therefore is beyond the FDA’s remit of control.

“With the treatment, these residents can continue to participate in enriching experiences, enjoy visits with their families and, most importantly, live in safety and freedom from self-injurious and aggressive behaviours,” the school said in a statement following the ruling.

“We have and will continue to fight to keep our loved ones safe and alive and to retain access to this life-saving treatment of last resort,” parents of the students added in a statement.

The Judge Rotenberg Center, Canton, is the only school in the US that uses electric shock treatment on its students, and has suffered heavy criticism from disability rights advocates, including Mental Disability Rights International (DRI) and the United Nations, which considers the practice “torture”.

“The idea of using electric shocks to torture children has been recognised as unconscionable around the world,” DRI’s president, Laurie Ahern, told the Guardian.

“The real torture is what these children are subjected to if they don’t have this programme,” institute and treatment founder Matthew Israel previously said to ABC News.

“They’re drugged up to the gills with drugs that cause them to be so sedated that they essentially sleep all day.”

There are around 300 students, including 48 overnight residents, at the Judge Rotenberg Center. According to Massachusetts News, about 55 of these are approved for the Graduated Electronic Decelerator shock devices, which remotely administer a powerful shock to the wearer’s skin.

“One client of ours is a woman who hit her head against the wall so many times that her retinas were detached,” said Attorney Max Stern, who represents the parents and guardians of Judge Rotenberg Center.

“It was not until she went to multiple various other institutions, not until she got to JRC and got this treatment that she was able to get this behaviour under control so she could have surgery to make it possible for her to see again,” Stern told Massachusetts News.

However, a 2006 report by the New York State Education Department found that the device was regularly used for minor disobedience and “behaviours that are not aggressive, health dangerous or destructive, such as nag*ing, swearing and failing to maintain a neat appearance”.

The report also found no evidence that the school “considers the potential negative effects, such as depression or anxiety, that may result from the use of aversive behavioural strategies with certain individual students”.

The school claims on its website that it “has provided very effective education and treatment to both emotionally disturbed students with conduct, behaviour, emotional, and/or psychiatric problems, as well as those with intellectual disabilities or on the autism spectrum”.

The Independent has contacted Judge Rotenberg Center for further comment.

    • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 年前

      The harsh sentences for guns + drugs are more a product of the War on Drugs than anything, and there's only one party that's taken significant steps to end that.

      Besides, gun control is a lot more bipartisan than Republicans like to admit, especially where it intersects with the opportunity to lock up poor people or people of color. You can find a bunch of Democratic district attorneys who aren't prosecuting marijuana possession, but you can't find a single Republican district attorney who isn't prosecuting gun possession.

        • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 年前

          Missouri has all sorts of state-level restrictions on gun ownership. Why aren't these state legislators removing those? Why are they instead attempting to nullify federal gun laws, something so blatantly unconstitutional that even the right-wing court system is likely to shoot it down? Keep in mind that 90% of criminal cases are non-federal, so even if they're somehow successful this is the worst possible place to start.

          The answer is that this is red meat for their base, not a sincere attempt to significantly roll back gun restrictions. You might also recall that a few years ago Republicans held the presidency, both houses of Congress, and the Supreme Court, and they didn't dismantle the same federal gun laws these Missouri chuds are performatively criticizing now.