I support Cuba and understand that regime change would make things much worse. My twitter timeline is full of MLs going "this is color revolution" as if it explains things. It made me wonder, what exactly makes a color revolution a color revolution.

I've read the wikipedia article and what I got is most of them are started by nonviolent student protests during disputed elections or other point of instability. Many are supported by western NGOs. What makes them inherently bad though? They sound like a strategy without specific ideological leaning...

    • StLangoustine [any]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      Point 10 is kinda important for the whole thing. It's the difference between those people basically being PR for a foreign coup and them partaking in a bunch of NGO money, because why turn down free money?