this is a subject that the USA gov and China even agree on. It is such a shame westerners have such a negative reaction to nuclear energy. but it isn't as profitable as fossil fuels/selling new electric cars so :meow-shining:
https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-energy
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1227103.shtml
im saying that right now in totality it is stored in designated buildings/on site. and yes the government is capable of storing nuclear waste, they do it right now. right now there is not a solution for the next hundred thousand years for storage, but there is for the next hundred, which I think you would agree is crucial to combat climate change
Oy gevalt!
"Capable" is supporting 1,000,000,000,000 tons of bullshit. If you're unwilling to learn, think, and reassess - there's nothing to be done. This convo is over.
u rite, you are seeing fossil emissions and the lack of any real substitute besides nuclear and consciously deciding that the issue of storage is more important than saving hundreds of millions of lives that unabated climate change will murder