As Democrats Seethed, White House Struggled to Contain Eviction Fallout - The New York Times

Biden was surprised...

President Biden was surprised by the furious reaction to the White House’s decision to ask Congress to extend an eviction ban, leading to a 36-hour scramble to keep people in their homes.

Biden and the White House tried to ignore the imminent mass-eviction crisis. Ghouls...

Until the last week of July, Mr. Biden and his team had accepted that a moratorium on evictions, which was first imposed last September and had already been extended three times, would have to end for good as planned on July 31 given a recent Supreme Court ruling. While the June ruling permitted the ban to continue to its scheduled end date, it strongly suggested that five of the nine justices were inclined to strike it down past that time if Congress did not enact a new law explicitly authorizing an extension.

Ron Klain asked Pramila Jayapal not to hold a press conference denouncing Biden’s inaction...

As the relief money moved slowly and the Delta variant surged, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus pressed Gene Sperling, who oversees pandemic relief programs for the White House, and Mr. Biden's chief of staff, Ron Klain, to commit to another extension. The officials were pessimistic and noncommittal. On July 27, Mr. Sperling emailed the group's chairwoman, Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat from the Seattle area, to say the answer was a firm "no." That was followed by a call from Mr. Klain, who asked her to delay a news conference denouncing the move.

Ms. Jayapal refused.

"Then we began agitating and building a chorus," Ms Jayapal said.

  • Woly [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    While the June ruling permitted the ban to continue to its scheduled end date, it strongly suggested that five of the nine justices were inclined to strike it down past that time if Congress did not enact a new law explicitly authorizing an extension.

    Astounded how liberals will moan about how Mitch McConnell is such a villain for stacking the court in a semi-illegitimate way, but still treat the supreme court as this royal authority that we're never allowed to challenge, despite Trump doing the opposite for for years and getting away with it.

    Oh the supreme court said that they might feel like striking down the next extension WHO CARES JUST DO IT. JUST KEEP DOING IT YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. FUCK.

    • inshallah2 [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      WHO CARES JUST DO IT. JUST KEEP DOING IT YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. FUCK.

      I had exactly the same thought. Including the all caps.

      I'm 100% sure the person who was most against action was Biden himself because he's a process moron. Jesus fuck - so what if the court strikes it down later. Do shit now!

    • starvedhystericnudes [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It turns out that if laws are t for your protection, obeying then is irrational ridiculous bullshit and you should just break them whenever.

    • Kaliop
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • medium_adult_son [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The only one I know of is Andrew Jackson saying, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it" - it probably never happened, but either way he didn't enforce the ruling.

        Instead of Georgia being an awesome refuge for Native Americans, it is the state that Stacey Abrams used to start their career as a liberal icon (and their favorite book is by Ayn Rand). :angry-hex:

        • Kaliop
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • Swoosegoose [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The SCOTUS has no means of enforcing its rulings, if the President or congress ignore them they cant do jack shit

    • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Astounded how liberals will moan about how Mitch McConnell is such a villain for stacking the court in a semi-illegitimate way, but still treat the supreme court as this royal authority

      Plenty of libs will agree with some sort of court packing/court reform/jurisdiction stripping/etc. if you point out this contradiction. This is definitely an area where you can at least get people on board with the idea of a radical change.