Permanently Deleted

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Personally, while I find the Dune poster here a bit bland, I would say that that painting isn't really much better. It's still a really similar kind of composition, characters take up a large part of the frame and the setting of the movie is also very present. It feels more like a flashy way to present the movie's important visual stuff and characters they might recognize to the audience rather than a really artistic representation of the movie. Maybe it's a bad analogy but it's kind of like the difference between an a billboard and a mural, where that kind of painted poster is just a more artsy billboard.

    • ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      You kidding? Look at Luke's pecs! And Leia's clingy and revealing dress! Hundreds of starfighters are swooping up towards the Death Star, while Darth Vader looms overhead! I guess we're just focusing on different things, because I would say that the compositions are completely different.

      Not to say that a movie studio couldn't do something interesting with Photoshop, it just seems to me that "overlap production photos of the actors" is the default.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah you're right, the painted poster does have more going on. I guess composition isn't the right word, it's more like someone made a rule book to how you should make a movie poster stating that you have to include at least 3 characters, a view of any IP you plan to make into merch, and the setting of the movie. Very few posters deviate from that formula.