The "best" IPCC AR6 climate scenario assumes currently nonexistent carbon removal technology and linear growth in said nonexistent carbon removal efficiency as the nonexistent technology "matures"
The "best" IPCC AR6 climate scenario assumes currently nonexistent carbon removal technology and linear growth in said nonexistent carbon removal efficiency as the nonexistent technology "matures"
Indigenous Humans (and also present humans) have massively shaped the ecology and climate of this planet to its benefit (and our detriment). See forest gardens in the pacific northwest as an example.
There is nothing stopping us from consciously designing future cities in and around forest gardens. Reforesting the amazon. And finding ways to reverse acidification in the oceans. But that's not profitable nor valuable right now.
Stuff like re-greening deserts is helpful too right? Turn them into carbon sinks
:sankara-shining:
fucking hexbear ate a huge post on the Three-North Shelter Forest Programme | article. My point was that deliberate projects of reforestation can absolutely change or mitigate climate change and other risks. But Capitalist Ruling Class are not about to tell YOU that.
deleted by creator
I want to turn my backyard into a horticulture garden with fresh foods and native plants. And I just wish i had the green thumbs, know-how and time.
If you have few things tying you down, I would look into WWOOFing for a Summer or else trying to get a seasonal production job at a green house (ideally on a vegetable farm). Or if you have the money to kill UC Santa Cruz has a really cool organic farming apprenticeship program. Which has been my dream if I win the lottery or something.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator