I think that's bad pacing honestly. Would it not make more sense to quickly summarise and then lump the games into distinct sections:
Classic 1-3
Turning point 4
Action crap 5-6
Reinvention 7-8
This way you can avoid repeating yourself and discuss both the game individually and as part of a whole.
Like, if I were talking about the Fallout series I'd lump 1 and 2 together because they're basically the same game with minor differences you can cover in a short amount of time.
Idk if you're talking about the series as a whole then talking about the game individually seems like the wrong way to do it.
I think that's bad pacing honestly. Would it not make more sense to quickly summarise and then lump the games into distinct sections:
This way you can avoid repeating yourself and discuss both the game individually and as part of a whole.
Like, if I were talking about the Fallout series I'd lump 1 and 2 together because they're basically the same game with minor differences you can cover in a short amount of time.
Idk if you're talking about the series as a whole then talking about the game individually seems like the wrong way to do it.