I think actual revolutions tend to take the form of their conditions. The most ideologically committed anarchists will enact laws of armament and rationing under siege.

The reason so many Marxist leninist revolutions cropped up during the 20th century was because that's just what worked for the conditions those revolutions formed under (with the added boost of the USSR being a guiding hand for a lot of them).

I don't believe in any of the shit about differing ideologies being conflicting, because in the end you're either on board with socialism or on board with capitalism and most working people know which side they stand on when the revolution begins.

Arguing is fine though, it forces us to constantly confront our beliefs develop our theory.