What if they absolved the kid because there was no evidence besides a cop's testimony? Wouldn't they be literally doing what they said the wouldn't? Isn't that enough proof of perjury?
Well I could convict based on a cop's testimony, but not in this case! and like the other person said, they should never know who refused to convict or why.
What if they absolved the kid because there was no evidence besides a cop's testimony? Wouldn't they be literally doing what they said the wouldn't? Isn't that enough proof of perjury?
Well I could convict based on a cop's testimony, but not in this case! and like the other person said, they should never know who refused to convict or why.