The term “middle class” is used so much by pundits and politicians, it could easily be the Free Space in any political rhetoric Bingo card. After all, who’s opposed to strengthening, widening, and protecting the “middle class”? Like “democracy,” “freedom,” and “human rights”, “middle class” is an unimpeachable, unassailable label that evokes warm feelings and a sense of collective morality.
But the term itself, always slippery and changing based on context, has evolved from a vague aspiration marked by safety, a nice home, and a white picket fence into something more sinister, racially-coded, and deliberately obscuring. The middle class isn’t about concrete, material positive rights of good housing and economic security––it’s a capitalist carrot hovering over our heads telling us such things are possible if we Only Work Harder. More than anything, it's a way for politicians to gesture towards populism without the messiness of mentioning––much less centering––the poor and poverty.
has evolved from a vague aspiration marked by safety, a nice home, and a white picket fence into something more sinister, racially-coded,
there was never a point in American history where that wasn't the case. You do know why the 2nd amendment is about guns and the 4th is about housing, right? www.readsettlers.com
Citation Needed Episode 91: It's Time to Retire the Term "Middle Class"
there was never a point in American history where that wasn't the case. You do know why the 2nd amendment is about guns and the 4th is about housing, right? www.readsettlers.com
Adam and Nima are wonderful but I don't think either of them have managed to entirely cast off liberalism yet in favor of the immortal science
deleted by creator
fixed thanks
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
:astronaut-2: :astronaut-1:
deleted by creator