GrabItNow [he/him] to electoralism • edit-23 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square107 fedilinkarrow-up1119file-text
arrow-up1119external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashGrabItNow [he/him] to electoralism • edit-23 years agomessage-square107 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHaste_Hall [he/him]hexbear54·3 years agoMy conclusion from this is that the Zionist lobby is very strong in NYC. link
minus-squareHaste_Hall [he/him]hexbear26·3 years agoLike the other user said, it doesn't change the outcome. Mitigating the effectiveness of the messaging you're describing doesn't have much of a cost. link
minus-squareRedbolshevik2 [he/him]hexbear20·3 years agoPrinciples are actually pretty good optics. link
minus-squareRedbolshevik2 [he/him]hexbear12·3 years agoI don't believe in electoralism in any way, but people who do seem to think that stuff matters, so that's the premise on which I'll argue. link
minus-squareLeninWeave [none/use name]hexbear18·3 years agoTo be fair, switching from no to abstain to try and please Zionist voters is... also optics. link
My conclusion from this is that the Zionist lobby is very strong in NYC.
deleted by creator
Like the other user said, it doesn't change the outcome. Mitigating the effectiveness of the messaging you're describing doesn't have much of a cost.
Principles are actually pretty good optics.
[jerking off motion]
I don't believe in electoralism in any way, but people who do seem to think that stuff matters, so that's the premise on which I'll argue.
Those people are wrong and stupid.
To be fair, switching from no to abstain to try and please Zionist voters is... also optics.
:yes-chad: