wmz [any] to politics • 3 years agothere will be no collapsemessage-squaremessage-square47 fedilinkarrow-up1119file-text
arrow-up1119message-squarethere will be no collapsewmz [any] to politics • 3 years agomessage-square47 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehexaflexagonbear [he/him]hexbear7·3 years agoWasn't even the first sacking post east/west divide? I think they'd arguably been pretty deep in the process of collapse at that point. link
minus-squareMardoniush [she/her]hexbear4·3 years agoFirst one was 390BC, arguably before Rome's expansion. The other two were in the 400s, well after the split (which actually stabilised the Empire for a century along with other reforms) and then again twice during the Byzantine reconquest of Italy. link
Wasn't even the first sacking post east/west divide? I think they'd arguably been pretty deep in the process of collapse at that point.
First one was 390BC, arguably before Rome's expansion.
The other two were in the 400s, well after the split (which actually stabilised the Empire for a century along with other reforms) and then again twice during the Byzantine reconquest of Italy.