Most wacky conspiracy theories manage to survive by being impossible to either prove or disprove, but Sovereign Citizens love filming themselves trying to talk their way out of being arrested or charged and subsequently eating shit. All the conspiracists these days are downloading their beliefs from YouTube and going wherever the algorithm takes them, so anyone looking at information on Sovereign Citizenery is also seeing the videos of people trying to put it into action and failing miserably.
How do people convince themselves that this is real when there are so many videos of people with similarly melted brains proving that this absolutely never works? I'm genuinely curious about what the rationale is. Do they think all the videos of judges telling Sovereign Citizens to shut the fuck up are fake, or that they didn't follow the script closely enough?
Got into an argument with my roomate whether it's degrading to call a chef 'chef' during kitchen hours. I just call them by their fucking name. He insists that it's necessary when things are busy for communication. I have worked five star restaurants and millionair 3 course 'charity' meals and never once have I had to call my chef by his fucking title and they would hate it if you did. He was a chef at a truck stop once. Hmmmm
Oh and he's the anarchist that is against hierarchies.
Wrong thread. I was aiming for the mega and the site reloaded
Upvoted because it was a funny story. Relevancy is for conformists
https://wearechefs.com/6-reasons-yes-chef-is-still-important/
He sent me this as an argument. It's two points of 'because this is how a French guy 180 years ago decided it should be done' and 'its aboud ruspect, capish?' it's also on a site called We Are Chefs so I'm guessing it's written by chefs. He really didn't understand the difference between dogma and an actual pragmatic means of doing things.