Oh yeah, it has nothing to do with this article. I just think it's really interesting that it's a relatively recent development. I think the issue with the article is probably just the author not understanding the correct way to refer to people in this context.
Worth noting also that they didn't used to be - the gendered variations were an early 20th century creation.
deleted by creator
Oh yeah, it has nothing to do with this article. I just think it's really interesting that it's a relatively recent development. I think the issue with the article is probably just the author not understanding the correct way to refer to people in this context.