Holy fucking shit! The victim complex is astounding. I have two dads. A bio dad and a step dad. I call them both dad.
It's amazing how the chud brain will almost always fall back to semantics when these kinds of topics come up, and yet still completely fail to understand how language works. This is the same line of reasoning employed when they piss the bed over oat/soy milk, or vegetarian sausages. It is utterly deranged.
I like how their final argument is that Star Trek was always about preserving the past (???) and that somehow a person having two mothers destroys their heritage, or some such shit. I can literally hear them pissing and shidding their pants.
It's amazing how the chud brain will almost always fall back to semantics when these kinds of topics come up, and yet still completely fail to understand how language works.
The understand precisely how language works, which is why they resort to these exhausting semantic arguments.
You can’t just use terms like “Pro-Bigot” and expect people to tribally buy into what they are without explaining what they MEAN.
Also, I find the term “sperm donor” offensive.
Just endlessly arguing around the edge of a point in hopes of exhausting the opposition and "winning" the argument.
I like how their final argument is that Star Trek was always about preserving the past
Holy fucking shit! The victim complex is astounding. I have two dads. A bio dad and a step dad. I call them both dad.
It's amazing how the chud brain will almost always fall back to semantics when these kinds of topics come up, and yet still completely fail to understand how language works. This is the same line of reasoning employed when they piss the bed over oat/soy milk, or vegetarian sausages. It is utterly deranged.
I like how their final argument is that Star Trek was always about preserving the past (???) and that somehow a person having two mothers destroys their heritage, or some such shit. I can literally hear them pissing and shidding their pants.
The understand precisely how language works, which is why they resort to these exhausting semantic arguments.
Just endlessly arguing around the edge of a point in hopes of exhausting the opposition and "winning" the argument.
Kill Your Heroes, folks. Only the good die young.