ssjmarx [he/him] to history • 3 years agoSHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!!message-squaremessage-square42 fedilinkarrow-up1127file-text
arrow-up1127message-squareSHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!!ssjmarx [he/him] to history • 3 years agomessage-square42 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
MY HISTORY PROFESSOR IS TALKING ABOUT HOW GREAT ROMMEL WAS RIGHT NOW AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
minus-squareinfuziSporg [e/em/eir]hexbear10·3 years agoNot only was he defeated, but he was defeated in his defensive campaigns that he had multiple years to prepare for. link
minus-squareGrouchyGrouse [he/him]hexbear6·3 years ago"But all the best troops were fighting the Soviets! Rommel had limited resources!" no shit dingus, that's because the Red Army was a fucking behemoth. link
minus-squareRedundantClam [they/them]hexbear7·3 years ago"I only lost because my best troops were busy losing on another front." link
minus-squareGrouchyGrouse [he/him]hexbear4·3 years agolmao that's a hilarious way of putting that, well done link
:failure:
Not only was he defeated, but he was defeated in his defensive campaigns that he had multiple years to prepare for.
"But all the best troops were fighting the Soviets! Rommel had limited resources!" no shit dingus, that's because the Red Army was a fucking behemoth.
"I only lost because my best troops were busy losing on another front."
lmao that's a hilarious way of putting that, well done