world ruled by supreme shadow elite. promotes hatred and violence towards marginalized groups
:what: how is this not real???
Epstein didn't kill himself, JFK Assassination, Iran Contra (leaving reality)
:wut:
world ruled by supreme shadow elite. promotes hatred and violence towards marginalized groups
:what: how is this not real???
Epstein didn't kill himself, JFK Assassination, Iran Contra (leaving reality)
:wut:
Lol no you quite obviously haven't, because you said that "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is a wacky conspiracy theory when it's literally in the official report.
“Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams” is a direct quote on the conspiracy chart bruh.
So you agree with the chart
Not all of it. In fact I might dispute its placement on the chart a bit, but I'm just saying that's what I was directly quoting.
I do agree that people who argue over whether or not "Jet fuel can melt steel beams" are missing the forest for the trees and tend to be deep in the conspiracy/bad science pipeline because they seem to think that this somehow that proves the planes and fire alone couldn't have made the towers collapse when everything I've seen and researched has made it clear that its by far the simplest and most logical explanation.
Lol
Can you show me this research?
If the strongest steel building to ever exist was destroyed by fire, I'd think we'd have updated architectural codes for steel buildings. Do those exist?
https://www.nist.gov/el/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation
To sum up from the FAQ
So yeah: jet fuel combined with tons of office equipment with a shit ton of heat release which burned at insane temperatures for a hella long time led to the collapse of the buildings structural integrity and down they went.
I don't know, I'm not an architect. I just listen to them.
Removed by mod
It being the "official story" doesn't mean it isn't true, and the fact that that's your go to position is very revealing. Again: Jet fuel burning for hours in contained spaces over multiple floors mixed with tons of other computer and office equipment weakened the structural integrity of the buildings and they collapsed.
Removed by mod
No it isn't. Maybe try being a little skeptical.
Guy who believes the US government:
"Maybe try being a little skeptical"
You haven't watched the video. Irredeemable American.
Guy who believes everything he sees in a dumb youtube video:
"Shut the fuck up you incurious savage."
Lol, I'd bet money you're exactly the sort of person who built an identity around that godawful "Zeitgeist" film back in the early 00s.
You literally cited the US government report and then asserted that it's not relevant that the US government commissioned it. World's smartest American lmao.
Oh god I'm right aren't I?!? You were that guy weren't you? And you're still that guy now!!!!
No I believed the stupid incurious bullshit that you do before I investigated the subject.
Be kind, comrade. I'm with you, but you won't win much support with this tone. :meow-hug:
Here's what I don't understand about the NIST: why won't they release the raw data for their computer models so that independent researchers can verify their simulation? Science is literally about being as open as possible. It would be in their interest to better communicate their knowledge to the public and put these theories to rest. They claim that releasing the data would be a threat to "national security". Is that really true? How does knowing how to demolish a building which no longer exists pose a threat? In order to prevent a 9/11, all you have to do is secure the airplanes, which they've already done.
:data-laughing:
Americans and their brainworms, best shit ever
I get to do my favourite thing, say "goddamn yankees" and be 100% correct
In the context of the chart, "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is obviously a stand-in for "WTC was a controlled demolition" or all 9/11 theories more broadly.