https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin
The reasoning? Because reliable sources such as CNN, BBC, WaPo, NYT, Bloomberg, and Business Insider call it “propaganda department,” therefore the neutral stance would be siding with those reliable sources.
at least wikipedia editing has the potential to be praxis, but we'd have to spend so much time and manpower on it that we'd be unable to do much more effective real world praxis (and that's assuming the feds wouldn't kick us out if we flocked to wikipedia)