Stuff like "stupid, idiot, moron, dumb," you know the ones. If you’re insulting someone for their shitty garbage beliefs and all you can manage to come up with is ways to insult their intelligence, appearance, or other aspect about them that has nothing to do with their cruelty and shittyness, you should maybe reevaluate.
Just saw a thread on here where a user was stubbornly refusing to adjust their language when another user politely pointed out that it was harmful to our comrades as well, and the person refusing was massively upvoted and the comrade trying to explain why it was harmful was downvoted. Thought we were better than that
I'm not calling anyone out, just wanted to make a post explaining my feelings on it and that when stuff like that happens (not the intelligence based insults, I know its hard to switch, but getting insulted for asking people to avoid them) it hurts and makes me feel less welcome here </3
Using words like “You’re being ignorant” or “That’s a cruel belief” is actually more effective than just going “lmao idiot”.
If those are the words you actually mean to convey I'd say use them instead :)
Edit: if the reception this post got isn't a good proof that this is something this community needs to grapple with, I don't know what is.
Honestly, I'm torn because personally, I try to avoid insults that aren't based on someone's character, like I'm not going to call Ben Shapiro short or whatever. At the same time, I find it understandable (if not exactly desirable) that others will grab whatever language is at hand to insult these people, because they are deeply odious and people want something that cuts deeper than saying they're a bad person in so many words.
I think you're getting a lot of pushback because of the tension inherent in a "Dirtbag Left" (or whatever you want to call the Chapo ethos) space. On one hand, what attracts people is its anarchic, and irreverent nature which is an antidote to suffocatingly woke spaces and civility politics. On the other hand, push it too far and you get Stupidpol (very bad). There's basically no way to solve that contradiction. To be clear, I think your post was valid, fine and good, but also you shouldn't be discouraged by negative responses because Chapo essentially exists as a tension between these two poles which means essentially a never-ending struggle session. I value your perspective on this as someone who sees something that makes them feel less welcome in this space, but I also have some sympathy for someone who wants to call Ben Shapiro a short smoothbrain or whatever.