Boiling water shouldn't take that long, plus you can use an electric kettle to boil water faster than your stove then dump it in.
I wouldn't really blame the recipe for not accounting for people with broken stoves not fixed by their landlord lol.
With baking stuff you gotta look up a video, it really is hard to be more descriptive than what they wrote with baking. I never get baked goods right without a video or good pictures, because you can both over and under mix a lot of recipes so you can't err on either side really.
I wouldn't really blame the recipe for not accounting for people with broken stoves not fixed by their landlord lol.
I would, actually. Much of the cookbook stuff, both professional and amateur, tries to sell itself as the healthier, cheaper, better, faster option. Which indubitably it will be, on some of those parts at least, but like half of it is aspirational bullshit. If you need a 30,000 BTU burner to make Jamie Olivers "I will fix the nation with my grand cooking" meal, that is not a solution, that is pandering to rich people to look down on poor people.
Now don't get me wrong, I cooked, even before I even moved out from my parents place. My mom, who is cool as shit, forced me to learn it, and thank god for that. And that was pretty good equipment, and she was a phenomenal teacher, so I didn't have to rely on bullshit as noted above. Which is why it irks me so much, I'd'a be fucked if I wasn't born very privileged on both monetary and cool parents basis.
I don't care if your coq-au-vin with truffle pan sauce assumes whoever is cooking it has access to nigh professional grade cooking equipment - it'll probably be true. But all the "cheap quick super easy worknight meals you can make between your 18 simultaneous jobs" (excuse the hyperbole, I am quite mad) assuming I have access to the kind of kitchen whoever wrote the fucking book has does nothing but further the argument that home cooking is expensive, either in time, or ingredients, which I do believe is wrong, which just turns people off it.
Whatever leftist theory you ascribe to, I'm sure it doesn't start with "be born privileged", aye? You wanna write the "Healthy poor people meals for poor and or time poor people meals" - you best be fucking considering more than "they're all just too fucking dumb" as a factor
I've used the cheapest stove at a place with a cheap (but not terrible, he fixed stuff quickly at least) landlord, you don't really need that good of a stove burner to cook stuff. That oven was pretty bad and uneven though, for casseroles it was fine but I wouldn't do any desert more complex than cookies there. Even frozen pizzas sucked because of the hot-spots. But if you have a shit stove you don't know the ins-and-outs of then you'll have a bad time regardless of recipe.
Reading your other comment it looks like you had to preheat your burners, which definitely makes pasta more annoying and not a quick thing to cook (I didn't even know cast iron hotplates were a thing, the cheapest stoves here are just bare resistive coil with no hot-plate cover). My go-to cheap/quick meal is pasta and whatever thing I throw together in a sauce, or pasta salad cold for later. I usually boil most of the water in a kettle, and boil a tiny amount in the pan to preheat it, it doesn't take that long doing it, and kettles are cheap.
Looks like on your bad stove it makes more sense to make a meal where you do prep while the burner/pan pre-heats like a stir-fry or something.
The recipes you talk about that fake being easy annoy me more because they never account for people not having good knives or knife skills and needing twice as long to prep, the difficulty of cleaning afterwards. Also Jamie Oliver always having a stupidly expensive niche ingredient, and over-relying on fresh foods (not canned or frozen) when he went on his anti-poor health-tirade is annoying.
I've done fine cooking, I was a pretty good home cook by then, but I can absolutely see how if you want to learn it as a time strapped adult, and those are who those 30 mins recipes are for, you're just gonna quit after the third time of following directions that take you 1 hour 15 instead of 30 minutes.
What was the quickest recipe you can make on that stove? Aren't you fucked no matter what if your burner takes that long to heat?
Rice takes like 15-20 minutes to cook, probably longer on your stove not using a rice cooker, potatoes take longer because you boil them from cold water so it's heavily stove dependent, I'm not sure what cheap starch makes sense for your stove tbh.
Pasta/noodle is still probably the best option if you have an electric kettle, that tip should be on every recipe where you throw something in boiling water. It really does save time, especially in Europe where the kettles should be faster because higher voltage.
But most recipe books are bad and seem like they're by a person who just copied it from somewhere else and never cooked it, and chatgpt is going to make this worse.
Cooking should probably be taught in school, but I was still specifically perplexed by your pasta tirade because that should be the quickest starch to make other than asian-style rice noodles or ramen, which idk if those are common in Europe, and still require boiling water quickly.
What was the quickest recipe you can make on that stove? Aren't you fucked no matter what if your burner takes that long to heat?
Incredibly large amounts of food for multiple days, because the cast iron plates did hold the heat insanely well. Use the time while they heat up for misé en place, cook once for like 2 hours and eat that for 4 days or so.
Quick starch if need be was usually Gnocchi via boiled water by the kettle
I'm not sure what cheap starch makes sense for your stove tbh.
Again, former stove.
but I was still specifically perplexed by your pasta tirade because that should be the quickest starch to make other than asian-style rice noodles or ramen, which idk if those are common in Europe, and still require boiling water quickly.
Ramen is common, rice noodles not so much. OTOH you can get cheap cooked lentils in a can here, that's been helpful back then.
Boiling water shouldn't take that long, plus you can use an electric kettle to boil water faster than your stove then dump it in.
I wouldn't really blame the recipe for not accounting for people with broken stoves not fixed by their landlord lol.
With baking stuff you gotta look up a video, it really is hard to be more descriptive than what they wrote with baking. I never get baked goods right without a video or good pictures, because you can both over and under mix a lot of recipes so you can't err on either side really.
I would, actually. Much of the cookbook stuff, both professional and amateur, tries to sell itself as the healthier, cheaper, better, faster option. Which indubitably it will be, on some of those parts at least, but like half of it is aspirational bullshit. If you need a 30,000 BTU burner to make Jamie Olivers "I will fix the nation with my grand cooking" meal, that is not a solution, that is pandering to rich people to look down on poor people.
Now don't get me wrong, I cooked, even before I even moved out from my parents place. My mom, who is cool as shit, forced me to learn it, and thank god for that. And that was pretty good equipment, and she was a phenomenal teacher, so I didn't have to rely on bullshit as noted above. Which is why it irks me so much, I'd'a be fucked if I wasn't born very privileged on both monetary and cool parents basis.
I don't care if your coq-au-vin with truffle pan sauce assumes whoever is cooking it has access to nigh professional grade cooking equipment - it'll probably be true. But all the "cheap quick super easy worknight meals you can make between your 18 simultaneous jobs" (excuse the hyperbole, I am quite mad) assuming I have access to the kind of kitchen whoever wrote the fucking book has does nothing but further the argument that home cooking is expensive, either in time, or ingredients, which I do believe is wrong, which just turns people off it.
Whatever leftist theory you ascribe to, I'm sure it doesn't start with "be born privileged", aye? You wanna write the "Healthy poor people meals for poor and or time poor people meals" - you best be fucking considering more than "they're all just too fucking dumb" as a factor
I've used the cheapest stove at a place with a cheap (but not terrible, he fixed stuff quickly at least) landlord, you don't really need that good of a stove burner to cook stuff. That oven was pretty bad and uneven though, for casseroles it was fine but I wouldn't do any desert more complex than cookies there. Even frozen pizzas sucked because of the hot-spots. But if you have a shit stove you don't know the ins-and-outs of then you'll have a bad time regardless of recipe.
Reading your other comment it looks like you had to preheat your burners, which definitely makes pasta more annoying and not a quick thing to cook (I didn't even know cast iron hotplates were a thing, the cheapest stoves here are just bare resistive coil with no hot-plate cover). My go-to cheap/quick meal is pasta and whatever thing I throw together in a sauce, or pasta salad cold for later. I usually boil most of the water in a kettle, and boil a tiny amount in the pan to preheat it, it doesn't take that long doing it, and kettles are cheap.
Looks like on your bad stove it makes more sense to make a meal where you do prep while the burner/pan pre-heats like a stir-fry or something.
The recipes you talk about that fake being easy annoy me more because they never account for people not having good knives or knife skills and needing twice as long to prep, the difficulty of cleaning afterwards. Also Jamie Oliver always having a stupidly expensive niche ingredient, and over-relying on fresh foods (not canned or frozen) when he went on his anti-poor health-tirade is annoying.
I've done fine cooking, I was a pretty good home cook by then, but I can absolutely see how if you want to learn it as a time strapped adult, and those are who those 30 mins recipes are for, you're just gonna quit after the third time of following directions that take you 1 hour 15 instead of 30 minutes.
What was the quickest recipe you can make on that stove? Aren't you fucked no matter what if your burner takes that long to heat?
Rice takes like 15-20 minutes to cook, probably longer on your stove not using a rice cooker, potatoes take longer because you boil them from cold water so it's heavily stove dependent, I'm not sure what cheap starch makes sense for your stove tbh.
Pasta/noodle is still probably the best option if you have an electric kettle, that tip should be on every recipe where you throw something in boiling water. It really does save time, especially in Europe where the kettles should be faster because higher voltage.
But most recipe books are bad and seem like they're by a person who just copied it from somewhere else and never cooked it, and chatgpt is going to make this worse.
Cooking should probably be taught in school, but I was still specifically perplexed by your pasta tirade because that should be the quickest starch to make other than asian-style rice noodles or ramen, which idk if those are common in Europe, and still require boiling water quickly.
Incredibly large amounts of food for multiple days, because the cast iron plates did hold the heat insanely well. Use the time while they heat up for misé en place, cook once for like 2 hours and eat that for 4 days or so.
Quick starch if need be was usually Gnocchi via boiled water by the kettle
Again, former stove.
Ramen is common, rice noodles not so much. OTOH you can get cheap cooked lentils in a can here, that's been helpful back then.
The only good cookbook for that stuff is Good and Cheap
deleted by creator