Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

  • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    It's not an issue of using less energy, it's an issue of consistently having any energy at all. The sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow, so if we rely on only those sources, there are going to be occasional periods of time when there isn't enough energy to run the hospitals. People will die.

    Downvoting isn't an argument.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Not to mention AC, which will become increasingly critical for keeping seniors alive, or food refrigeration, or a dozen other things.

      • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        How about Yanks start insulating their homes, then? The US has the highest per capita usage not because it objectively needs the most energy, but because it expends it the most recklessly. Living conditions will have to change substantially to survive human habitat destruction - anything else is utopian anyway.

        • 389aaa [it/its]
          ·
          4 years ago

          It really does seem like human existence is pretty much just downhill from here no matter what, materially speaking. Shit seems like a choice between the faster apocalypse or slower one to me.

          • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            The later we get on with transition, the worse it's going to be, for sure. However, I can say for myself that I live pretty comfortably in a well-insulated, AC-less apartment and it gets to 40°C here and over in summer. That's 104°F

            • 389aaa [it/its]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Oh yeah I mean, I'm not doubting that properly insulated houses work just fine, it's just that the whole topic kinda got me thinkin about that shit. Just generally feels like humanity fuckin bonked it's head on the great filter pretty bad. And we don't even get a cool apocalypse like nuclear war or something, just very slow planet getting increasingly fucked.

              • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                I mean... If it is any consolation, I believe all-out war for resources is a likely outcome of global consciousness reaching any kind of "this habitat is fucked for real, we need to scramble to survive"-kinda stage.

                • 389aaa [it/its]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Lmao yeah that's fair. Would be more interesting, at least. Either way, I'll continue to hope for a stupid pseudoposadist alien ex machina to keep myself sane until the hammer drops.

                  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    I guess we all cope in different ways. Still hope the dolphins just start wrecking shit tbh ;(

      • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        With current technology, there isn't enough lithium on the planet to make enough batteries to run the world on non-constant renewables like wind and solar.

        • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          You don't need lithium at all for stationary energy storage, it's just attractive for mobile applications because it's less heavy than iron nickle for example.

            • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              mix of decentralized nickel-iron batteries for homes, semi-centralized nickel-iron banks as a supplement on infrastructure level, pumped water storage wherever possible, some power to hydrogen for overly productive days or where pumping isn't realistic.

              Also, it's not like you can't have a few backup gas plants for emergencies. Those can be 'turned on' almost instantly - as opposed to nuclear for example.