Guy Debord, born on this day in 1931, was a French Marxist philosopher and filmmaker. Among his notable achievements are his 1967 work "The Society of the Spectacle" and co-founding the communist Situationist International in 1957.
Guy Debord was born in Paris in 1931 and began his career as a writer after dropping out of the University of Paris, where he was studying law. Debord joined the Letterist International, a group of avant-garde French artists and intellectuals, when he was 18.
Debord was first to propose the concept of the "Spectacle", refering to the role of media, culture and advertising in post-World War II consumerist society, and the way it is able to commercially co-opt and repackage counter-cultural ideas and movements.
On the nature of media and the new-found emphasis on appearance, Debord stated "Just as early industrial capitalism moved the focus of existence from being to having, post-industrial culture has moved that focus from having to appearing."
The concept of "Spectacle" became central to the ideas of the Situationist International, which Debord co-founded in 1957. Ideas from the Situationists proved influential on protestors during the May 68 uprising in France, where quotes and slogans from Situationist work would appear on grafitti and posters.
Debord himself would disband the Situationist International in 1972, following internal tensions amongst its members, and would focus on creating experimental film and tabletop war games, publishing "A Game of War" in 1987.
Suffering from depression and alcoholism in his later years, Debord committed suicide at his home in 1994.
Situationist International
The Situationist International (SI) was an international organization of social revolutionaries made up of avant-garde artists, intellectuals, and political theorists. It was prominent in Europe from its formation in 1957 to its dissolution in 1972. The intellectual foundations of the Situationist International were derived primarily from libertarian Marxism and the avant-garde art movements of the early 20th century, particularly Dada and Surrealism. Overall, situationist theory represented an attempt to synthesize this diverse field of theoretical disciplines into a modern and comprehensive critique of mid-20th century advanced capitalism.
Essential to situationist theory was the concept of the spectacle, a unified critique of advanced capitalism of which a primary concern was the progressively increasing tendency towards the expression and mediation of social relations through objects. The situationists believed that the shift from individual expression through directly lived experiences, or the first-hand fulfillment of authentic desires, to individual expression by proxy through the exchange or consumption of commodities, or passive second-hand alienation, inflicted significant and far-reaching damage to the quality of human life for both individuals and society. Another important concept of situationist theory was the primary means of counteracting the spectacle; the construction of situations, moments of life deliberately constructed for the purpose of reawakening and pursuing authentic desires, experiencing the feeling of life and adventure, and the liberation of everyday life.
The situationists recognized that capitalism had changed since Karl Marx's formative writings, but maintained that his analysis of the capitalist mode of production remained fundamentally correct; they rearticulated and expanded upon several classical Marxist concepts, such as his theory of alienation. In their expanded interpretation of Marxist theory, the situationists asserted that the misery of social alienation and commodity fetishism were no longer limited to the fundamental components of capitalist society, but had now in advanced capitalism spread themselves to every aspect of life and culture.
When the Situationist International was first formed, it had a predominantly artistic focus; emphasis was placed on concepts like unitary urbanism and psychogeography. Gradually, however, that focus shifted more towards revolutionary and political theory. The Situationist International reached the apex of its creative output and influence in 1967 and 1968, with the former marking the publication of the two most significant texts of the situationist movement, The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord and The Revolution of Everyday Life by Raoul Vaneigem. The expressed writing and political theory of the two aforementioned texts, along with other situationist publications, proved greatly influential in shaping the ideas behind the May 1968 insurrections in France; quotes, phrases, and slogans from situationist texts and publications were ubiquitous on posters and graffiti throughout France during the uprisings.
-
Guy Debord: The Life, Death, and Afterlife of a Brilliant Crank :debord-tired:
-
Enragés and Situationists in the Occupations Movement :france-cool:
https://hexbear.net/post/158599 check out this mega about a fellow comrades new game they made themselves and give it support
Resources for Organizing your workplace/community :sabo:
Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:
Buy coffee and learn more about the Zapatistas in Chiapas here :EZLN:
Here are some resourses on Prison Abolition :brick-police:
Foundations of Leninism :USSR:
:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:
Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:
Remember, sort by new you :LIB:
Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:
Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:
Queer stuff? Come talk in the Queer version of the megathread ! :sicko-queer:
Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:
Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:
!worldbuilding@hexbear.net :european-soviet:
!labour@hexbear.net :iww:
!cars@hexbear.net :cringe:
WHICH ONE IS IT JUST FUCKING TELL ME
just read some article where an immunologist says high death rates in the uk are a thing of the past. but then there are other articles where they say it's still as deadly LKSDJFLKJSDHFKLJDSHNFKLDSJHDFSihujnredftuijkhldfrseiuhjkn;esrdfiusfdilukhjnsegrdfi;kujnhfgdtr
It's less deadly. It's less deadly than every dominant variant so far. The debate among scientists is now if it's somewhat less deadly or extraordinarily less deadly. With how infectious it is we would be seeing collapse-inducing strain on our healthcare systems both domestically and internationally if it were as deadly as Delta. But it isn't. Omicron waves in countries that are on the downswing did not see the hospitalization and death numbers Delta waves did.
South Africa was seeing Delta patients die alongside Omicron patients that didn't. This was in a population with 20% immunocompromise. When the case rate exploded the death rate didn't: https://twitter.com/rid1tweets/status/1475915795704123398?s=20
It's less deadly. That doesn't mean it's not deadly, but it's less deadly than Delta or even wild-type. If you get it and are vaxxed, it will probably be fine. It is not guaranteed to be fine. You should still be cautious. Wear a mask and get boosted. Don't crowd indoors.
it can also be less deadly but the higher infection rate means hospitalization or death rate remain the same or get worse. we'll know more in a month or so.
we should also expect this. highly infectious diseases that are becoming endemic have a strong evolutionary pressure on them to become more infectious and less deadly - they infect more people and make more virus by not killing their hosts, not the least because then the host is less likely to maintain defenses against the virus. it's why influenza is still with us today but isn't nearly so deadly as the Spanish Flu.
ok i will assume you know what you're talking about. thank jebus. Hopefully it will go the way of the spanish flu. I live with people who could be vulnerable to covid so i've been super cautious. I just want this to be over lol