It's common here to criticize Great Man Theory, in that it's not just one person that caused changes, it's many. However, where I'm lost is where they further imply that things happening have absolutely nothing to do with individual choice, and material conditions are the only thing that matters. This really just sounds like predestination with extra steps, as in, your material conditions will choose whatever actions you take, which completely loses me.
The logical conclusion to this mindset is that organization and trying to do political action is pointless, after all, material conditions will either make it happen or not make it happen, which I don't think anyone is trying to say.
The way that I'd put it is this - Napoleon obviously had an enormous effect on history. But without the opportunity the revolution afforded him, he would have simply climbed up the ranks as far as a jumped up corsican could, before retiring.
Material conditions determine things most of the times, until the systems fail and things go into freefall. That's when individual decisions change history.
Yeah and conversely the revolution likely would happen without Napoleon there anyway. Human history is a human invention and thus humans can change its outcomes.