Although, are we really capable of moving enough water that distance to make a dent in a literal desert
more than you think
I did the calculations: to move the amount of groundwater present in continental US (30k cubic miles), you would need to run a Mississippi river for 200 years
The Taklamakan desert is the size of Germany
Germany is 4% of the US surface area
Mississippi moves 1.5 billion m3/day
Total desalination world wide purifies 95 million m3/day
global total desalination (half of which is literally just Saudi Arabia) is already 7% of the Mississippi River. (and
We need 4% of the Mississippi River to green the Taklamakan over the span of 200 years.
Saudi Arabia moves around 3.5% of the Missippi River alone, lol.
This is very greenpilling. It's not the desalination of the water that's the point here, but rather the sheer MOVEMENT of water. There is tons of other stuff (oil, gas, other water, other fluids) that are moved in huge quantities annually.
More Missippis = more fasterer = you don't have to wait a century
The Bengal Dam reservoir actually generates more water than the Mississippi, 200 cubic miles/year instead of 150/year.
So if China could build a trench that transports that water, the Taklamakan would turn into lush, green Germany in 6 years. If you split the water 3 ways between India/Pakistan/China, then 18 years.
Feasibility of building that trench, which basically would be an artificial river: I don't know. I intuitively feel that it's doable, and I feel that the rewards at hand would more than justify any financial sacrifice taken. We're talking about a country that has reclaimed from the sea, over 2 Puerto Rico's worth of land since 1950--I feel like they can definitely build a river from Bangladesh to the Tarim Basin.
Geography would be rough, because it has to go through the Tibetan plateau. But Chinese labor built the California railroads, it definitely feels well within the realm of possibility.
Belt and road --> Belt and River, it has to happen
deleted by creator
more than you think
I did the calculations: to move the amount of groundwater present in continental US (30k cubic miles), you would need to run a Mississippi river for 200 years
The Taklamakan desert is the size of Germany
Germany is 4% of the US surface area
Mississippi moves 1.5 billion m3/day
Total desalination world wide purifies 95 million m3/day
global total desalination (half of which is literally just Saudi Arabia) is already 7% of the Mississippi River. (and We need 4% of the Mississippi River to green the Taklamakan over the span of 200 years.
Saudi Arabia moves around 3.5% of the Missippi River alone, lol.
This is very greenpilling. It's not the desalination of the water that's the point here, but rather the sheer MOVEMENT of water. There is tons of other stuff (oil, gas, other water, other fluids) that are moved in huge quantities annually.
More Missippis = more fasterer = you don't have to wait a century
The Bengal Dam reservoir actually generates more water than the Mississippi, 200 cubic miles/year instead of 150/year.
So if China could build a trench that transports that water, the Taklamakan would turn into lush, green Germany in 6 years. If you split the water 3 ways between India/Pakistan/China, then 18 years.
Feasibility of building that trench, which basically would be an artificial river: I don't know. I intuitively feel that it's doable, and I feel that the rewards at hand would more than justify any financial sacrifice taken. We're talking about a country that has reclaimed from the sea, over 2 Puerto Rico's worth of land since 1950--I feel like they can definitely build a river from Bangladesh to the Tarim Basin.
deleted by creator
Geography would be rough, because it has to go through the Tibetan plateau. But Chinese labor built the California railroads, it definitely feels well within the realm of possibility.
Belt and road --> Belt and River, it has to happen