A massive struggle session has appeared in the UK left with arguments over defending the BBC or not now that it has been announced that the tv license might be gone by 2027.
The factions seem to be:
A "But it makes good entertainment and documentaries and music and puts lgbt people in shows"
B "Yeah but none of that has anything to do with the extreme political harm it clearly does".
I am in faction B and have no idea how to get through to the first faction. Libs obviously also support the first faction.
I assume Hexbear being anti-treats lately would also be in faction B but could be wrong.
What are your thoughts on the topic overall?
I'm not saying that the same set up will replicate. the conditions there are different. but the main difference between a public institution that can't ever broadcast anything radical because it would offend the oligarchs and private institutions that serve directly as their voices is the immediacy of the control they offer to those oligarchs. "local news" is something of misnomer here -- it's not that we have thousands of independent news organizations. they're all owned by a single broadcasting company -- a business that directly profits on selling scams to people by lending them their voice of authority. and people are utterly blind to this -- if you point it out to them, you get swept up in their narratives about their commitment to fighting you in the "culture war", a narrative constructed and sold by the same entities that want eyeballs to sell them scams.
our media has helped polarize people, sure. but I'm not sure it's had much impact on radicalization -- polarization here refers to the growing divide between camps of liberals that mostly agree with each other but that hate each other because of said manufactured culture war.