• Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Fun fact: Trotsky, when he wasn't sick, injured, or busy with work, chose to miss going to Lenin's funeral much to the shock of literally everyone (not sarcasm).

    It was such a fuck-up on Trotsky’s part he had a mental break upon realizing how much if a faux pas it was to miss the funeral of the leader of the first socialist country of the world.

    • Lundi [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Trotsky really the Tobias Funke of communism. Like, I hold no resentment towards him, he just comes across as such an aloof guy whose biggest problem was how much of an annoying nerd he was.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
        ·
        3 years ago

        the more I read about him, he strikes me not as an aloof guy, but a smartass prick that thinks he's the hottest shit since marx, while also being very skilled and rhetorically eloquent (Personally I don't like his writing style because it's filled with way too much fluff and nerd shit, and doesn't get to the fuuuucking point). He seemed like he'd be a pain in the ass to work with in a collective, but probably would be alright to work under.

      • Sklorp [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The difference is that unlike Tobias, Trotsky did basically do all the work.

        • Lundi [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I agree, I have a lot of respect for Trotsky as a revolutionary. There is an incredible compelling human story to be told about him and his relationships with the other Soviet leaders. It's just funny imagining him as a dork being dunked on.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yeah he straight up missed going to the Monster Mash, it was gonna be Lenin's debut bash!

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Oh he wishes.

        Trotsky’s own explanation in his autobiography of his absence from Lenin’s funeral is thin and unconvincing, and does small credit either to his heart or head. He declares that a coded message from Stalin announcing Lenin’s death was delivered to him in his private car at the station in Tiflis on January 21st, that is to say a few hours after Lenin died. He continues, “I got the Kremlin on the direct wire. In answer to my inquiry I was told: ‘The funeral will be on Saturday; you cannot get back in time and so we advise you to continue your treatment.’ Accordingly, I had no choice. As a matter of fact, the funeral did not take place until Sunday and I could easily have reached Moscow by then. Incredible as it may appear, I was even deceived about the date of the funeral.”

        This final accusation was as unjust as it was ungenerous. Lenin died on the afternoon of Monday, January 21st, and his funeral was originally set for Saturday, the 26, but the number of people who wished to see him was so great–thousands came from places more distant than Tiflis–that it was postponed 24 hours. The journey from Moscow to Tiflis by ordinary express takes three days and three nights–allow four or even five days and nights in 1924 in winter-time. Trotsky’s private car was in the station when he received the news on Monday night. Tiflis is one of the biggest railroad depots in south Russia and there is not the slightest doubt that the Red war-lord, whose authority was still unquestioned, could have ordered a special chain and been back in Moscow within 72 hours.

        Trotsky’s account continues theatrically, “The Tiflis comrades came to demand that I should write on Lenin’s death at once. But I knew only one urgent desire–and that was to be alone. I could not stretch my hand to lift the pen.” He then adds that he wrote a “few handwritten pages.” Strangest of all, there is no word in Trotsky’s recital of any surmise on his part, much less compunction, as to what people in Moscow might feel about his failure to return immediately. Any thought of the duty he owed to his dead comrade seems to have been as remote from his mind as perception of the political effects of his absence. Instead he writes of spending those days before the funeral lying on a balcony in the sun at Sukhumi, a twenty-four hour train journey from Tiflis which apparently caused him no physical distress–facing the glittering sea and the huge palms–and of his own “sensation of running a temperature” with which mingled, he says, thoughts of Lenin’s death.

        To make the picture complete Trotsky quotes a passage from his wife’s diary: “We arrived quite broken down; it was the first time we had seen Sukhumi. The mimosa were in full bloom, magnificent palms, camellias. In the dining room of the rest-house there were two portraits on the wall, one–draped in black–of Vladimir Ilich, the other of L. D. (Trotsky). We felt like taking the latter one down but thought it would be too demonstrative.” Later Madame Trotsky wrote: “Our friends were expecting L. D. to come to Moscow and thought he would cut short his trip in order to return, since no one imagined that Stalin’s telegram had cut off his return.” (This refers to the [alleged] message from the Kremlin saying that the funeral would be on Saturday and that Trotsky could not get back in time.) “I remember my son’s letter received at Sukhumi. He was terribly shocked by Lenin’s death and, though suffering from a cold with a temperature of 104, he went in his not very warm coat to the Hall of Columns to pay his last respects and waited, waited, and waited with impatience for our arrival. One could feel in his letter his bitter bewilderment and diffident reproach.” On these extracts from his wife’s diary Trotsky makes no comment at all.

        Duranty, Walter. Story of Soviet Russia. Philadelphia, N. Y.: JB Lippincott Co. 1944, p. 100

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
            ·
            3 years ago

            The body was laid in state in the Kremlin, while members of the Bolshevik Central Committee took turns to watch over the remains of the revered leader…. among the symbolic figures standing silently by the bier, Stalin was prominent, but Trotsky was never seen. In his later efforts to justify this amazing stupidity, Trotsky took refuge behind the fact that he was ill at the time and only received the news of Lenin’s death while traveling to the Caucasian Riviera for a holiday, a fact which would certainly not have prevented Stalin from taking his place by the body.

            Cole, David M. Josef Stalin; Man of Steel. London, New York: Rich & Cowan, 1942, p. 61

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      He had to have some kind of spectrum traits, I cannot believe he can be that much of a gigantic nerd otherwise.

      • Sklorp [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The idea of Trotsky as some kind of turbo dweeb is not really congruent with his actual life
        Remeber that Lenin kept him around partly for his personal charisma and public speaking skills.

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Not sure Lenin "kept him around" so much as he was joined at the hip of the other big labor organizer in Russia in the middle of a civil war.

          The hierarchical structure of the Bolshevik Party is heavily overstated. These guys were more like guerrillas working towards a common cause than some kind of corporate board doing business intrigue on one another to get ahead.