Is there a lore reason why American elections are so convoluted?

tombruzzo@lemm.ee · 10 months ago

Is there a lore reason why American elections are so convoluted?

emizeko [they/them] · 10 months ago

In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of the landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. The senate, therefore, ought to be this body; and to answer these purposes, they ought to have permanency and stability.

—James Madison

JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them] · 10 months ago

Also Madison.

The second method will be exemplified in the federal republic of the United States. Whilst all authority in it will be derived from, and dependent on the society, the society itself will be broken into so many parts, interests, and classes of citizens, that the rights of individuals, or of the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority.

allthetimesivedied [they/them, she/her] · 10 months ago

Shocker there what “tyranny of the majority” actually meant.

SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them] · edit-2 10 months ago

Yeah, it makes much more sense when taken in the context of them all being wealthy landowners, many of whom owned slaves

buckykat [none/use name] · 10 months ago

WIIHAPPYFEW [he/him, they/them] · 10 months ago

our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation.

We really are living up to what the founding fathers wanted whodathunkit