As a union nurse (1199) I can assure you all that the travelers making lots of money is NOT the problem, and is only happening rn because for the first time in decades, it is an area where workers are so desperately needed, yet so scarce, that they can basically name their rate and have it honored. This is scaring the shit out of the people at the top, and they want to nip it in the bud before other peasants start to catch on

Edit: Here's a direct link for ppl who don't want to go to R*DIT

https://welch.house.gov/sites/welch.house.gov/files/WH%20Nurse%20Staffing.pdf

If you have a SLAY KWEEN (D) rep or a Marjorie Taylor Green adjacent chud rep(R), they are both likely on this

  • JosipBRUHTito [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    3 years ago

    China is something the USSR could never hope to be in the later years of the Cold War, competent. And the new era of internet media makes this impossible for America to cover up or propagandize away

    • Bloobish [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      From what I understand a lot of this comes from China understanding that if they entangle themselves with the west while still operating under socialist principle then it'd be mutual suicide if they collapsed cuss they would take the US economy with them correct? I'm a newbie to Chinese policy but so far it seems Deng had some good ideas on taking the teeth from the US

      • JosipBRUHTito [none/use name]
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        I have seen some well translated Chinese lectures on this, and basically it boils down to what you are saying, but also fit their situation well. Think about China in 1970s. A preindustrial society devastated by decades of war and invasion, struggling to industrialize. They needed industry, technology, and money. All they really had were natural resources and a well educated population (one of the aspects of the cultural revolution period that actually worked out quite well were literacy campaigns.). Their leaders had refused to be a flunky to what they rightfully saw as the decaying Soviet Union, they weren't content to just take orders from Moscow, which didn't leave them with many options. To accomplish rapid and massive industrialization, on a scale never seen before or since, they just had to bait the West, and lead their CEOs, industrialists, and bankers by the nose. They had the best trained workforce in the world willing to work for third world wages, and were a relatively safe and stable country. And of course, they copied the shit out of every piece of machinery and industrial equipment that was sent to them. They were playing catch up in a game where they were several hundreds of years behind in development. That is where the stereotype of China stealing inventions comes from, and in those early years it was pretty accurate.

        However, with this growing industrial base established, China was able to do what the rest of the developing world nations are not powerful/self sustaining enough to do, which was to cut their reliance on technology and foreign capital flowing into the country. Now it is decades later, and they don't need our help developing industry. They don't need foreign technology, because in many areas they have now advanced to or beyond the Western standard. And soon with the Belt and Road initiative, they will no longer need America's capital or consumer base. Kwame Nkruma in Ghana was very particular in that Ghana was going to "modernize", not "Westernize". China is the most successful example of this in modern times, and historically on par with the explosive rise of industry in the Soviet Union.

        However, China is not the Soviet Union of yore, and people need to realize this. They are not(yet) arming left wing rebel groups anywhere, to my knowledge. And I do not expect them to start doing this for another decade or two, if they do at all. Really the only thing I think we can expect with any certainty over the coming decades is the slow but steady rise of China as the leading world power, in trade, technology, and eventually influence on the world stage. What will happen, and how they will respond to a flailing and dying empire in the West remains to be seen.

        • Bloobish [comrade/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          My honest opinion with what little I know is that likely they'll begin going hard in dominating geopolitics once the US has it's own suez canal moment as well as begins falling apart from the inside even more rapidly. Here's hoping China can be a guiding light in these times when they do decide to finally start aiding nascant leftist movements (the aid China is doing with the Sandinista gov is awesome)

          • JosipBRUHTito [none/use name]
            hexagon
            ·
            3 years ago

            Oh absolutely, hopefully that's just them getting their feet wet. Also what is a Suez canal moment, not sure what this references. The US did have a Suez canal moment in Panama a long time ago lol

            • Bloobish [comrade/them]
              ·
              3 years ago

              It's a reference to Britain losing control of the Suez Canal post WWII when Egypt tried nationalizing it then the US came in and took it and did not give it back, it's more or less a seminal event that signals a previous empire is no longer ascendant

          • Oldreader [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            once the US has it’s own suez canal moment

            Didn't that already happen?

            Several times?

            • Bloobish [comrade/them]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Small microcosms of it yeah, but tbh we will have a moment like it when China decides to take Taiwan or a trade port from the US and the rest of the world doesn't care and tells the US to sit down.

              • Oldreader [none/use name]
                ·
                3 years ago

                I've followed several Suez moments where US power was decisively broken, forever. Now I hear it hasn't happened yet?

                • Bloobish [comrade/them]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  I could be wrong in how I'm applying it but I've always been under the assumption that a suez moment is when a event occurs that fully cements the collapse of a nation and its fall from geopolitical dominance (I see the US currently slipping but they've yet to fully fall until all the US military bases lay abandoned and rotting imo)

                  • Oldreader [none/use name]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 years ago

                    I heard Trump's attempted withdrawal from Syria that was blocked by the Pentagon was a Suez moment. His attempted withdrawal from Germany that was blocked by the Pentagon was a Suez moment. Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan was definitely a Suez moment. But it's going to happen real soon now?

                    If this dang website had a search function I'd find all the posts.

        • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I wouldn't expect China to be arming left wing movements in the next 20 years, they probably won't ever do that. China is actually doing "socialism in one country", and it's worked fantastically. Imagine if the Soviets had actually been able to develop on their own, or if they could have given up that Trotsky/LeftCom-esque need to stoke the global movement and developed relationships with the "Non-Aligned movement" instead of trying to force other countries to follow Moscow.

      • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Regardless of if it was the plan or simply the consequence (on either side of capital or communism), finance sought cheaper wages and shitter working conditions, and China used this to its advantage to develop its productive forces. I still can't reconcile whether this was a massive capitulation or some 4D hyper-chess shit, but the end result is the same. China has ended up as an economic and industrial powerhouse, while being the only nation on its scale to maintain any ability to subjugate finance. They still operate largely under the capitalist mode of production, but capital's influence is limited to a degree we can't even imagine in the west.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      China is something the USSR could never hope to be in the later years of the Cold War, competent.

      The competency of the Chinese state is always and forever up for debate. Certainly, Xi wouldn't need to run around doing SWAT raids and mass arrests if everyone downstream operated as this friction-less corruption-free communist utopian machine. But the Chinese state has a massive population and a firm position within the global supply chain, up to and including directly into the beating heart of the Western Empire. It has room to fail, to engage in inefficiency, to analyze and self-correct, and to improve over time. That's a benefit the USSR never had.

      The USSR entered the 1950s struggling to yank its post-war accumulated satellite territory out of horrific poverty and potential population collapse. It had to immediately position itself for a global Cold War that would last the next fifty years. And it would need to fight a propaganda war against a rival that had been fighting communist ideology domestically for longer than it had existed.

      China entered the 20th century with a fabulously wealthy industrial coastline and an utterly insulated interior. It had a glut of domestic workers, a wealth of domestic and neighbor-state resources to draw on, a global supply chain to exploit, and the tacit approval of western powers to pursue unlimited speedy economic growth in anticipation of a Capitalist-Reform pivot some time in the next decade. The west wasn't in a Cold War with China. It was engaged in a kind-of East Coast Marshal Plan - just plowing every last ounce of capitalist energy into assisting Beijing with rapid industrialization and incorporation into the western economic engine.

      You can write this off as Deng's 11D chess. Or ascribe it to a Nixon/Reagan-Era colossal foreign policy fuck up. Or just note how 9/11 Changed Everything, accidentally deflecting America's imperialist impulses from China to the Middle East for nearly 20 years. But it has far less to do with Chinese inherent competence than a simple historical exemption to the Cold War that China benefited from and Russia did not.