Like, Roosevelt broke up monopolies, for instance. That stuff was insufficient, but it was SOMETHING. Unlike now, where they just let capitalists do whatever they want.
Like, Roosevelt broke up monopolies, for instance. That stuff was insufficient, but it was SOMETHING. Unlike now, where they just let capitalists do whatever they want.
Wells comes off as a real idiot who doesn't have a concrete understanding of what ge us saying. Honestly, and this is cringe as fuck but I couldn't help thinking it while reading him, Wells really makes me think of Jimmy Dore
This is funny, because I feel like Wells gives the best possible defense liberal defense of capitalism, and Stalin takes it apart so easily.
Fortunately, I don't know anything about Dore.
His whole argument basically boils down to "but what if we convince the bourgeois to be nice to us?"
My dad has that brand of hippie :brainworms:
:doomer: It's very tiring.