• CheGueBeara [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      They could just change the rules. The rules don't really matter, either, obviously.

    • jabrd [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Because rules aren’t just an abstract cudgel for the ruling class that can be tossed away whenever convenient

      • Shoegazer [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        I mean normally sure, but they’ll need other members to agree on rule changes and exemptions. I don’t think it will bode well for NATO if the US decided to take charge of accepting Ukraine while other countries are hesitant.

        • newmou [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          “Given the extraordinary circumstances, a majority of NATO member countries have agreed that in this unprecedented situation, Ukrainian membership to NATO must be granted not despite its conflict status, but because of it. Russian aggression and destabilization must be countered, for the good of the Ukrainian people.” — there, done. Problem solved. Rules mean nothing

          • throw42069at [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            The point of having Ukraine in NATO in the first place would be to legitimise war with Russia. An illegitimate entry of Ukraine into NATO would delegitimise the war in the eyes of the public.

    • InternetLefty [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Right, this would only work if the Ukrainian govt recognizes the LPR and DPR