some pretty choice quotes in here
“The U.S. is in no position to tell China off,” she said. Then she mentioned the three journalists who were killed in NATO’s bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade in 1999, a tragic incident that prompted widespread anti-U.S. protests in China.
“NATO still owes the Chinese people a debt of blood,” she said. You sent
"Recent speeches by some of China’s most influential advisers to the government on international relations suggest that the miscalculation may have been based on deep distrust of the United States. They saw it as a declining power that wanted to push for war with false intelligence because it would benefit the United States, financially and strategically."
also mentions 'little pinks' which I guess is the Chinese equivalent to 'tankies' more or less?
i saw other users here say that a ton of the discussion in japanese social media is closer to this sites takes than cheering china. Of course you would have much more russia stanning than in western social media but of course that would also be what rags like NYT would focus on.
Also, like, if NYT was to cover this sites "opinions" they would cover them exactly like this . Every non nato supporting position would be covered as cheering for Russia's invasion
This. A lot of the takes I've seen aren't even focused on the conflict itself, but on NATO and pointing out media hypocrisy.