• catposter [comrade/them]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    A Utility Monster is a thought experiment by Robert Nozick, which critisizes utilitarianism. He asks us to imagine a monster which recieves more utility (more pleasure basically) from each unit of resources than any humans do. It is therefore logical, and indeed morally required, to give everything to the monster. For example, if we had a piece of cake, the Utility Monster would get 1000 times more joy out of eating it than any human, so the action that would cause the most total pleasure would always be to give the cake to the monster.

    The pun based 'Utility Monster' depicted in the comic gets a great deal of pleasure from destroying pipes. Apparently that pleasure is so great it outweighs the pain it would cause us to have the pipes destroyed. Since that would still result in more net pleasure, it is morally required to destroy the pipes. Peter Singer is a contemporary utilitarian.

    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      For example, if we had a piece of cake, the Utility Monster would get 1000 times more joy out of eating it than any human, so the action that would cause the most total pleasure would always be to give the cake to the monster.

      "Oh yeah? Well what if I took your idea to an impossible extreme? Not so smart then, huh?"

      • riley
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
          ·
          3 years ago

          have you considered that if you watch it with the frames shuffled in completely random order then it would be incomprehensible

          That isn't how he already makes them?

        • eduardog3000 [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Most of them are either completely useless or actively harmful.

          Like the one about the AI that will punish anyone who didn't actively work towards making it. At best it's useless because it will never exist, at worst it's actively harmful because the existence of the thought experiment itself will cause people to make it real.

          • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            But this one isn't, this is a valid critique at a very obvious and very real issue with an ethical framework that is at the core of the socio-political structure we currently live under.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            The Torment Nexus is right around the corner, as inspired by the book Please Don't Build the Torment Nexus! :so-true:

    • catposter [comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      basically, morality is a lie, eat hot chip, kill the rich, do nice things because the community of humanity is a living body that thrives on cooperation

        • catposter [comrade/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          3 years ago

          we must not see our devotion to others as ‘do-gooding’ merely for others; rather we must conceive our lives and interests as bound up with those of others.

    • Owl [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I completely missed the pun.

      I am ashamed.