I would guess that a dwelling space for several hundred thousand of our people could very easily be provided.
A comPuter can decide who stays based on youth, health, ssssexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of necessary skills. Naturally, they would bread prodigiously. There would be much time and little to do, but with the proper breading techniques and a ratio of say...10 females to each male, I would guess we could work our way back to the current Gross Domestic Product within 20 years.
That's not a real thing read anthropology books written after 1970.
No seriously though the term is reductive at best and outright misleading at worst. Human history and the history of economics is far too complicated. There was never a static universal social structure and economy. It's been weird and complicated for the entire six million years we've been genetically distinct from chimps.
Well, on the plus side, humankind may still find a way to survive and repopulate after we reach +9C average global temperatures.
And hey, if anything, being reduced to 10,000 people in a private doomsday bunker just makes it easier for world communism to happen.
I would guess that a dwelling space for several hundred thousand of our people could very easily be provided.
A comPuter can decide who stays based on youth, health, ssssexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of necessary skills. Naturally, they would bread prodigiously. There would be much time and little to do, but with the proper breading techniques and a ratio of say...10 females to each male, I would guess we could work our way back to the current Gross Domestic Product within 20 years.
:strangelove:
Mmm proper breading techniques. :homer-druel:
Who wants in my apocalypse bunker harem? I’m taking applications
Mister President, we cannot afford a Bunker gap.
Communism requires near post-scarcity levels of economic development and production. It is not possible with 10,000 people in a bunker
deleted by creator
That's not a real thing read anthropology books written after 1970.
No seriously though the term is reductive at best and outright misleading at worst. Human history and the history of economics is far too complicated. There was never a static universal social structure and economy. It's been weird and complicated for the entire six million years we've been genetically distinct from chimps.