There recently was the news of plastic recycling not being plausible and people were surprised.
I myself met so many men having sex with men who don't know what PreP is, who kept fearing HIV when they could've gotten supply for months for 10 euros.
There recently was the news of plastic recycling not being plausible and people were surprised.
I myself met so many men having sex with men who don't know what PreP is, who kept fearing HIV when they could've gotten supply for months for 10 euros.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions Here is a good list
I have very little trust in them left tbh.
Wikipedia is ok for non political and non historical entries. They are undeniably making propaganda on those subjects
I can highly recommend reading the english language entry for the Ministry of State Security (chinese intelligence service). Filled to the brim with either embellishments, straight up unsourced claims or just very flavourful descriptions of how such a service would function in a country that is actively being sabotaged by the english speaking world.
A lot of these have sources that actively contradict the claim, or are technically correct on the most redditor-esque of ways?
Links to this article.
Or
uh doesn't that imply that they would not be in freefall and thus not weightless if they weren't in an orbit. This seems very poorly worded
Wrong. Just wrong.
Provide proof that it's wrong then? Otherwise you're just continuing the misconception.
It's a running joke here that AR-15 stands for Assault Rifle that shoots 15 bullets, as we coyly play the fool in order to be funny.