Was talking to a classmate about Cuba and told him how embargoes and meddling is one of the main reasons that Cuba is so isolated and behind in many fields compared to other countries.

He snarkily asks why Cuba cares about sanctions since they're communist and shouldn't care about capitalist trade. I reply with something like "because they're marxist, and marxists don't believe in utopia." He gives me a blank stare so I continued talking about how the post cold war system is capitalist, so regardless of what you truly believe in, you have to play according to their rules. If the the system was socialist, then any remaining capitalist country will have to play by the socialists' rules or be left out.

He then says that's proof that Cuba is a failed state because they can't produce everything domestically and need to rely on other countries and that capitalists wouldn't need to play by anyone's rules. I told him that if Taiwan became communist or was reunited with China, the US would be on its knees begging to have access to its technology (okay, I didn't say those exact words because I was trying to stay away from snark). He had no idea what I was talking about regarding Taiwan's tech, so I then brought up how there are more failing capitalist countries in Africa and the Middle East and Latin America than there are existing socialist countries - which for the most part, are doing much better.

He then went on about how religious people are stupid and how Islam is the cause of most of the major conflicts of the modern world without any sort of outside influence. At this point I just chuckled and he ended the conversation. :wall-talk: He's a self proclaimed liberal, though I believe it.

Guess his major

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Polisci, i know people in my second major with the exact same :brainworms: so it's gotta be that

    • ScotPilgrimVsTheLibs [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I studied poli sci and I was redder than Mr. Krabs at the time (still am). I deadass felt like there was a lot of shit I was not allowed to say, but I had to hint at subtly.

      If I had to do college over again, I'd probably just stick to history if the economy wasn't fucked or if I feel up to the challenge (and the economy was fucked): Engineering.

      • StuporTrooper [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Civil Engineering is one of the few engineering fields where you don't have to sell your soul to make good money.

        • ScotPilgrimVsTheLibs [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Hey, for what it's worth, political science did scratch my curiosity for civics and some public policy and now I am fully and unironically trainpilled. That, and I had a really good professor. Sure, they're a :LIB:, but I totally respect their word. Yeah, I would give my left nut to make American infrastructure that's environmentally friendly, efficient, and beautiful too. Make America fun, dammit.

          The main problem here is getting people to agree on trains. California's efforts to build a high-speed rail are embarassing, but I know damn well that it is being intentionally sabotaged, and that authorities are dragging their feet to build it, almost begging voters to come in and demand them to stop.

          • StuporTrooper [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I think it's less that there's intentional sabotage and more that the U.S. does not have productive capability for stuff like trains. We do on paper, but it's all subcontracted out twenty times and they skim so much off the top nothing ever get's done and they run out of money. Idk maybe on a project as big as California high speed rail there are intentional scam artists or saboteurs, but in general nothing can get done because everybody has to get paid first. Simply incapable of using our vast resources.

            But bridges need to get built so hopefully you can get into that.