the evidence is wearing dark clothing with several seeming to wear the same jacket... this isn't exactly a smoking gun imo.
some strange procedure to give people dark clothes to constrast with the backround/highlight the face seems more plausible than AI technology getting this good.
some of those redditors are just gawking at these pictures and calling injuries & skin color evidence of AI generation :yikes:
Okay, that last one definitely got me to reconsider. I do event photography and I capture a lot of awkward angles, but I've never seen a neck come out of somebody's chest like that.
AI facial generation is absolutely in the phase of exiting the uncanny valley zone and moving toward convincing realism. Now it's creepy for different reasons.
no, i'm fully aware its good, but the same jacket shit is not a pastejob of faces on the same clothes, the repeat clothing is in a novel position everytime. thats the sorta thing i'd think is more complicated than just having them all random, no?
but this grasping at straws is also completely unnecessary. like whatever if theres real photos of a bunch of uyghurs? does that mean they're actually in a anti-islam gulag and their offenses are what the leakers claim? literally could be the paddywagon pics from urumqui the morning after a holiday :shrug-outta-hecks:
^ 5 second google search found this. I don't see it as grasping at straws. I think it's a chilling warning of strategies that are going to be used against people like us in the future.
this-person-does-not-exist puts out clothing too, im not saying its impossible but that its not good evidence for it being fake. it only makes sense if it were a labor-saving measure but since the repeats aren't in the same position its the same amount of work, as far as i understand
AI tech is this good. If you had five months you could easily gin up a big batch of faces and remove any that had the Innsmouth Look.
Not in any way saying that's what happened here. I think the idea that they were having everyone put on the same jacket to have their picture taken is more plausible.
But we're basically past the point where you can tell the difference between a real photo of a person and an AI generated photo.
the evidence is wearing dark clothing with several seeming to wear the same jacket... this isn't exactly a smoking gun imo.
some strange procedure to give people dark clothes to constrast with the backround/highlight the face seems more plausible than AI technology getting this good.
some of those redditors are just gawking at these pictures and calling injuries & skin color evidence of AI generation :yikes:
I don't feel confident enough to make any sort of judgment but the weird comments about their physical traits definitely made me uncomfortable.
There are a lot of comments which are just plain bad reasoning (omg they look like video game characters lol), but at the same time:
https://archive.ph/QPORs/f1ed054fcba5e6f898d8c174d0aa314d091d05f2.jpg
look at his neck. I don't think that is how cameras work.
Okay, that last one definitely got me to reconsider. I do event photography and I capture a lot of awkward angles, but I've never seen a neck come out of somebody's chest like that.
Understandable, picking apart AI can often feel like bodyshaming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAPUkgeiFVY
AI facial generation is absolutely in the phase of exiting the uncanny valley zone and moving toward convincing realism. Now it's creepy for different reasons.
no, i'm fully aware its good, but the same jacket shit is not a pastejob of faces on the same clothes, the repeat clothing is in a novel position everytime. thats the sorta thing i'd think is more complicated than just having them all random, no?
but this grasping at straws is also completely unnecessary. like whatever if theres real photos of a bunch of uyghurs? does that mean they're actually in a anti-islam gulag and their offenses are what the leakers claim? literally could be the paddywagon pics from urumqui the morning after a holiday :shrug-outta-hecks:
https://www.trendhunter.com/trends/fashion-models
^ 5 second google search found this. I don't see it as grasping at straws. I think it's a chilling warning of strategies that are going to be used against people like us in the future.
this-person-does-not-exist puts out clothing too, im not saying its impossible but that its not good evidence for it being fake. it only makes sense if it were a labor-saving measure but since the repeats aren't in the same position its the same amount of work, as far as i understand
AI tech is this good. If you had five months you could easily gin up a big batch of faces and remove any that had the Innsmouth Look.
Not in any way saying that's what happened here. I think the idea that they were having everyone put on the same jacket to have their picture taken is more plausible.
But we're basically past the point where you can tell the difference between a real photo of a person and an AI generated photo.