There is a lot of answers but if I'd say just one it would be rejecting the current institutional power. At least right now in our time period. Fully rejecting the imperial state, no matter how much they potentially benefit from it seems like a solid transition

we are all lib so let's not gatekeep what leftist™️ actually is. I guarantee you were a lib once too(still are, but once too.)

    • OutrageousHairdo [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Eh I'm mostly talking about USA, where capture of the democratic system is so thorough that even if 80% of the people voted for the PLA or whatever they'd still pretend that no actually Norm McRespectable (Nazi, Delaware) won

      • geikei [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Its true for like 95% of countries and all western ones not just the US

    • geikei [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      When did "voting for (in paper) non bourgeois parties and candidates" solved our issues and moves us closer to socialism. Maybe you can argue a couple latin american countries like Venezuela and Bolivia as exceptions but still these socialist movements have had huge militant non electoralist organizing upholding and catalysing their electoral existance in a way no western equivalent has ever been close to having and even still there probably would have been a straight up revolution and siezure of power if the electoral path was completely denied

      • blue_lives_murder [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        these socialist movements have had huge militant non electoralist organizing

        Yeah, that's dual power, which is what I was hinting at. Electoralism alone accomplishes nothing