• Ideology [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Right now they're just focused on finding the whistleblower. Decision is expected to come in the next month or so.

    https://theconversation.com/change-wont-appear-overnight-in-many-states-if-the-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade-183203

    https://archive.ph/ZmTRY

      • Ideology [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Well they betrayed the trust embedded in our holy systems! Mitch McConnel is actually doing press releases where he salivates over the leaker getting caught.

      • Wertheimer [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not necessary:

        Experts say leaking the draft opinion likely wasn't a crime, and Curley's investigative tools are limited. She could theoretically hire an outside law firm to assist, and in other judicial records cases, the FBI has been called in. But it isn't clear if she or others have the power to issue subpoenas to get material from journalists or the fewer than 100 people in the court — including justices — with access to a draft opinion.

        (From the second link above)